To my mind animals must live in nature. They aren't all adapt to live with us. Indeed, they need freedom and space to develop themselves. Animals like horses or dogs need to run without borders, however animals like cats can live with us, for they don't necessarily need space, or to let off steam a lot. To conclude I think that some animals have to live in nature or in the space they suit them, and others can live with us.
I agree with Ocean Andriamialy. I think that man and all forms of animal life must be considered with the same point of view. Why would we keep the animals at home? Why do not live in animals's home ? We only have one planet and we are forced to share it with the other inhabitants . We must respect the other animals because we must not forget that we are only apes. In conclusion I would say that animals SHOULD live in freedom because it is their home. We would not live out of our.
"from the same ...... why should we keep animals at home?...... why not live in animals's home?;...animals should be free..... we would not live outside ours...
Animals are living being. Like us, they have different lifestyles, they eat different things and they live in different places. For so long, we know animals which is adapted to live in a particular place, won’t be able to live in another place. A person who lives in Equatorial can’t live in polar country like Russia or Canada. We are adapted to live in special places. It’s the natural selection. To conclude, I think animals should be left to live in the nature because it’s their natural habitat like we live in our natural habitat.
in my mind, nature is animals natural place to live, so they have to be free,and their environnment must be preserved but sometimes humans are good with animals, because they help them, for example when they are injured, or when they are sick, humans give them a second chance! sadly, loads of animals are badly treated by humans and it's a pity!
I think that most animals must live in nature. When the life begun, all of the animals lived in nature. If some if them live very well with us (cats, dogs...) others live it very bad like lions (for example) in the circuses or killer whales in Marineland. But we also defend them by associations (that of Brigitte Bardot is very famous)
"When life begins....every animal lives..... if some of them....others such as lions... have a difficult life... However, we also defend them.... there are many associations, which defend and protect animals...."
To my mind animals must live in nature. They aren't all adapt to live with us. Indeed, they need freedom and space to develop themselves. Animals like horses or dogs need to run without borders, however animals like cats can live with us, for they don't necessarily need space, or to let off steam a lot. To conclude I think that some animals have to live in nature or in the space they suit them, and others can live with us.
ReplyDelete"aren't adapted.......to develop." "or in the space that suit them"
ReplyDeleteI agree with Ocean Andriamialy. I think that man and all forms of animal life must be considered with the same point of view. Why would we keep the animals at home? Why do not live in animals's home ? We only have one planet and we are forced to share it with the other inhabitants . We must respect the other animals because we must not forget that we are only apes. In conclusion I would say that animals SHOULD live in freedom because it is their home. We would not live out of our.
ReplyDelete"from the same ...... why should we keep animals at home?...... why not live in animals's home?;...animals should be free..... we would not live outside ours...
ReplyDeleteAnimals are living being. Like us, they have different lifestyles, they eat different things and they live in different places.
ReplyDeleteFor so long, we know animals which is adapted to live in a particular place, won’t be able to live in another place. A person who lives in Equatorial can’t live in polar country like Russia or Canada. We are adapted to live in special places. It’s the natural selection.
To conclude, I think animals should be left to live in the nature because it’s their natural habitat like we live in our natural habitat.
in my mind, nature is animals natural place to live, so they have to be free,and their environnment must be preserved but sometimes humans are good with animals, because they help them, for example when they are injured, or when they are sick, humans give them a second chance! sadly, loads of animals are badly treated by humans and it's a pity!
ReplyDelete"Animal are living beings...... We have known for a long time.....animals are adapted....... to live in nature (without "the")"good to"
ReplyDeleteI think that most animals must live in nature. When the life begun, all of the animals lived in nature. If some if them live very well with us (cats, dogs...) others live it very bad like lions (for example) in the circuses or killer whales in Marineland. But we also defend them by associations (that of Brigitte Bardot is very famous)
ReplyDelete"When life begins....every animal lives..... if some of them....others such as lions... have a difficult life... However, we also defend them.... there are many associations, which defend and protect animals...."
ReplyDeleteHello
ReplyDeleteI think that pets such as cats or dogs shouldn't live in nature but others like bears are better in nature for their survival as for ours