2010/05/20

GROUPS

Do you think that it is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group? Why? Why not?

8 comments:

  1. I think this is a bad idea because we are big for us to manage alone and a chef can create many bored as jealousy and the more he can make bad choices, so that if everyone gives his ideas that might give a good result

    ReplyDelete
  2. "because we are old enough to manage on our own"..... a chief can create many problems such as jealusy.... he can make bad choices but if everyone gives his/her idea..."

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think it's a bad choice because we must always run ideas, we must meet the expectations of everyone and it's not easy.
    It must also manage conflicts between people.
    Being a group leader is a lot of responsibility.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think that to be a chief of a group it is better. Because the chief of a group decides choices, even çi it is a great responsibility.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think being a member of a group is better than to be the leader, you have less responsability that way.
    But it really depends of your own personality, if you have the spirit of a leader or of a follower.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think same think than Emma. I think it's better to be a leader of a groupe.
    But when you are leader you have to pay attention on the other members of your group and take decisions for the good of the group.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi,
    I think that being the leader of a group is good because we make decisions but if the group does something wrong, it's our fault.
    So I don't no what is the best.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Personally, I think being a group leader is better than being a group member, but only if you're organized and are sure to have the group's agreement.

    ReplyDelete